Not Here.(Kay label
added)
Nor Here.
But in context the former
Here is the
proper angler.
In a
less embedded aside, Leonard Pitts Jr. hits the nail on the head of
American Exceptionalism.
In another arena, a friend noted how
trustworthy FOX and Bill O'Reilly are. Well, 28% and 9% are far from a margin of victory unless you are looking for an American Icon. NBC, MSNBC, CBS, and ABC combine for 29% while CNN's Cooper and Blitzer match O'Reilly's 9%, and the a4mentioned other network's hosts(Matthews, Brokaw, Couric and Sawyer tied) combine for 12%. So it is only in the
winner[*] take all,
not knowing what it takes world, where
follow the
leader matters. Now that is a real
Laffer Curveball! Or
is it?
[
Then there is Pawlenty of
problems. Bottom line: if money is a maker then tax it as much as labor. That is an
inverse paradox or maybe
praximoron.]
[The
bottom line is
obliquity with
intent.]
[
Sub** Text]
** asterisks apply to that link, but is not the missing link, but does fit the leadership narrative over people.
[*] boo yeah! Stewart boosts O'Reilly's ratings(**), which likely rigs poll. i.e. maybe FOX viewers are more fair and balanced when the left is presented.
(**) I don't have the Nielsen ratings but it might be reflected in the poll.
[Footnote: scroll over some links for some understanding, but unfortunately links that may need
clicking on do not last forever. Hence I hope to be less obtuse but no less oblique in the future. There should be
no joy in
mud-
ville, as the outcome of the NY26th shows, as
divided meta(
for) prevails. But to unembed these analogies, the Ryan plan was the issue in the divide to lose in New York,
48% takes it, while the issue will next be before the U.S. Senate with Democrats in the majority and Republicans faced with laying their votes on the line. Some will leave the sinking ship, diluting the lemonade. If I may make a
few Truman references it is not a direct analogy, but hanging their
votes on their
necks will be like dividing to conquer.]
[
Meanwhile Up-
Date]
[Speaking of
not Truman--something about:
If it's a choice between a genuine Republican, and a Republican in Democratic clothing, the people will choose the genuine article, every time; that is, they will take a Republican before they will a phony Democrat, and I don't want any phony Democratic candidates in this campaign.
With my lemon twist on it:
If it's a choice between a genuine Moderate, and a Moderate in Republican clothing, the people will choose the genuine article, every time; that is, they will take a Democrat before they will a phony Moderate(update 10-11-2011), and I don't want any phony Moderate candidates in this campaign.
OK, it loses a little bit of it's zest, but that is the nature of the slippery-slope, trickle down, lemonade, mudville.]
[
Update 12-8-11 The Last Word? As it
seemed to line up.]
